Tuesday, December 18, 2007

diparch review dec07



recently we had the design review for the diploma student... the result are as listed below:




  • sem 01 - non talent but potentials young designers - stay hungry (architecturaly of course..) - casuality:1


  • sem 02 - big gap between good + hardwoking designers (girls) and average + lazy = not serious (boys) designers - casuality:2


  • sem 03 - a lot of improvement form this batch ...keep on going! - casuality:1


  • sem 04 - are your learning curve is mellowing down or what?...buck up or ship out..-casuality:2


  • sem 05 - the young and not so dangerous...some can stand the pressure but a lot of you just melt down and get carried away emotionally...a lot of blood and tears in this batch...-casuality:8

Monday, June 18, 2007

external reviewer..










architecture or design is subjective...it is an art that will triggers individual or group's opinion..nevertheless, it is quite common trying to minimize this impact on the projects / works...but do not forget that it is an art of tangibility and we need the outsider to help us to be more sensible in our design..

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Learning – a life long process


Learning is usually thought of interms of “learner” and “theacher” in a specially equipped places called “classroom”.... But actually it is an activity that take place whenever an individual responds knowingly to a stimulus....“learning” philosophically means acquiring new knowledge, skills and even wisdom....

Consequently, it can or might occurs any where a stimulus may be encountered ....That means every setting should have an educational potential....The idea is that when more than one person is present the “potential” is increased (as we do came along with different experiences and perceptions)....That means all the arrangement of space should employ all the available recources to expedite and enhance the learning experience...

We could increased the educational potential of many other places simply by making certain of their nature of function is unstandable to anyone who encounter them....This is a learning process that can be materially influenced by appropriate design features....The stimuli of learning resources that may be provided will vary greatly with the setting of the “learner’s room” which to intensify the learning experiences....What ever the level of stimuli, the ambient conditions must be suitable i.e with appropriate lighting, acoustic, ventilation and a safe place to sit or stand in comfort in order to absorb the information....

learning can occurs when ever there is a source of information....there should also be more non academic “spaces” where the “learner” can interact ....as these “spaces” should not be viewed as merely utilitarian adjuncts of the teaching spaces themselves....there are an integral part of the educational setting....therefore the layout must be designed to foster out-of –class learning just as the “education spaces” must be designed to foster in-class learning.....

to be a learning center and a complex of social organization, it must serve the purpose of a “campus” ; where ever the location is ....

Thursday, May 17, 2007

dparch final project overall review

overall, the sense of "passion" totally disappeared from the student's. work..none seems to enjoy doing what is called the essence of architecture course..which is "design"...the same "soft" issue (for sem 01) or blatant mistakes (for higher semester level) is being repeated..the "unpresentable" presentation method is used...deja vu all over again..


..unconscious mind made all the action..remember the zombie?


the verdict:

sem 04 - didn't meet the "requirement" by the standard of "IPTA"

sem 03 - lack of commitment

sem 04 - the standard is decreasing

sem 01 - do not follow all the above!!

Friday, May 04, 2007

dip 04 final project

lost in time...lost in space ...lost in scale...lost in translation...

that is my conclusion upon reviewing the final crit of dparch04 final design project...
from 17 candidates; 5 were OK, 10 were given KO and surprisingly we got 2 absentees ...(may god punished 'em) ...hopefully they got a very good reason for not attending the final crit...

17 - 5 = 12

12 individuals whom were given 2 months of time; didn't manage to present a decent design proposal...to the extent that some were not even know or forgot to indicate where is the main entrance to their's design...

brief were not fully understand...and some of requirements were purposely neglected...reason and justification are totally disappeared form the design...

lacks of interest...poor attendence...is one of the main culprit (nevertheless between one night CFC & MUFC were dumped out of EC..which is only a minor factor*)

basic and raw ideas were seen in most of the design scheme...which is too late to blossom under just one week's time...

5 candidates barely manages to survive the final crit...reason?...ideas were not really tangible and convincing as they were presented during the conceptual stage...among the five survivors; none is in my "B" list...maybe if they push harder in this one week of presentation time; maybe they will open the "B" door...until yesterday the "B" door is totally sealed and hopefully the 12's also will buck-up and rise to their true capability...

MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU







* KOP - you'll never walk alone unless you're BLUES or DEVILS..

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

floating mosque







melaka

another "floating" type of mosque...

do we need it anymore...

sabah


penang

terengganu

what is a mosque??

does the elements of dome represent islamic ?

what is islamic arch?

http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2006/11/5/lifeliving/15909747&sec=lifeliving

http://www.islamicarchitecture.org/architecture/themosque.htm

Friday, April 06, 2007

PJ once said..

"Architects are pretty much high-class whores. We can turn down projects the way they can turn down some clients, but we've both got to say yes to someone if we want to stay in business..."


Philip Johnson
(RIP 2005)

dosa siapakah ini...



dosa siapakah ini....

bandingkan 2 imej berikut: pelik tetapi nyata kerana kota yang dibina di kuala kedah mempunyai ciri-ciri yang sama dengan pembinaan kota-kota pada zaman pertengahan di eropah atau tinggalan sejarah dari senibina "moorish" ...sedangkan binaan di kuala kedah tersebut di bina pada abad milenium...tidakkah kita ingin tahu siapakah arkitek yang telah merealisasikan ide ini...persoalannya, mengapakah ide sedemikian yang datangnya daripada golongan professional..sanggup melacurkan "imej seni bina tempatan"...terlalu jauh perkaitannya diantara ruang dan masa di antara kedua-dua imej tersebut...apatah lagi jika konteks persekitaran dan budaya diambil kira...ermmm...sedih dan pilu bila seni pada "senibina" dibuang sehingga menjadi "bina" sahaja...bina apa sajalah...asalkan faktor RM yang dipentingkan...hilanglah "seni" dalam "senibina"...



apakah yang dibayangkan oleh arkitek yang merekabentuk binaan ini...sebuah kota medieval di lokasi perkampungan nelayan di kuala kedah...???..."perlacuran senibina" adalah satu ide yang pernah diperdengarkan oleh seorang pensyarah dan kenalan dari UTM...ide-ide pengamal senibina atau "practitioners" yang bergini sebenarnya seolah-olah menikam dari belakang tentang ide pembentukan senibina malaysia...

apakah yang boleh dipelajari oleh pelajar-pelajar jurusan senibina sekiranya binaan tersebut dijadikan "case study"...sering diperkatakan didalam studio rekabentuk, "your design...the idea is lost somehow interms of form, function and contextual elements"... sedangkan dalam situasi sekarang, apa sahaja boleh dibina asalkan mendapat sokongan politikus atau klien yang sanggup membayar...jadi mengapa institusi pembelajaran sahaja yang sering di"kambing hitam"kan tentang pembelajaran senibina sedangkan situasi "apa yang dibelajar tidak sama seperti praktis"...
banyak lagi binaan-binaan "out of context" yang telah dibina dan mungkin akan dibina pada masa akan datang...
mungkinkah patut dijalakan satu kajian atau satu anugerah "turkey of the year" untuk "binaan yang sewaktu dengannya"...




p/s: ali setan - takkanlah pakai samping, baju melayu...tapi pakai topi koboi?

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Ayam Brand Architecture


institutions that privately offering "architecture" education as it is becoming like a very good strategy to initiate incomes..ermm...just by adding the "the text" as part of the program then..ka-blam!...one "architecture-based" program is on the way to the market...basically, this kind of "brand" managed to "mengeliru dan memperdayakan" the student...lot of tales of happiness and successful career path can be achieved thru "the brand"...some were being induced or may i qoute "seduced" to take this path as basically it leads to a "professional" tagline..(aren't we?)...unfortunately, the students now is trapped inside a "bubu" (traditionally handcrafted fish trap made of bamboo)...

they can't afford to get out (1% still managed to squeeze themselves out..) either being told that their "architectural education" is not being recognized by the "board" or technically knock out by the structure of "the brand"...their tales in pursuing "architecture-education" seems like a journey through the middle-ages..(remember the "romanesque" gloomy and dull...) seems like no nody cares about as long as RM is considered..who cares about the non-conforming "LAM" syllibus...just wait until the 3rd strike and then you're out!!!
what is architecture if not about design?..well basically the idea of design as a core subject is a must in every aspect...architecture without studio-life...what a genius!...a non-travelling architecture student?...Philip Johnson (RIP) would chocked himself...


nothing can be exposed to them after a hefty sum of RM being dump just to get the "architecture"...to put them inside "the box"...maybe to "condemmed" them inside is more appropriate...which is the "contradiction" of keep telling them to "think outside the box"...
FLW once said "education is about enlightment"...
finally, the students also play part as the negligence party...don't let "the brand" keep manipulating the system....

Forrest Gump: Stupid is as stupid does...-1994

p/s: still waiting for the "renaissance man" to drop by...

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

The Ideator


lately, i miss to keep track on the www of one of my x-lecturer or the one that has the "X" factors through out his idea(s) and approach(s)...
the idea of "Memahami Model Penghasilan (Niat Laku Hasil)" is one of the model that is very useful to me...

TAPAK = HASIL = NIAT = AKTOR = LAKU=ATURAN
the one an only wan* b
one=wan

Truth Against the World

"what is education without enlightment? It's mere conditioning. And what is mere conditioning but maintaining mass ignorance, the poisoning end of what we call 'civilization'. There is nothing more dreadful, more dangerous, nothing to be more feared in this world, than plain or fancy ignorance. We can see this today in the drift towards conformity. We can see it in the education of modern-mass society. You can blame education for much of this because education has not seen what we have needed as a free people. It has not provided enlightment. It has provided conditioning instead."
Frank Lloyd Wright gave this speech in 1957 to a group of students..

1957 = we declare our independence..
2007 = marks 50 years of the event

i got this problem...students never (0.0001% seldom) ask me after my lecture..when i ask "o.k,..any question?"
everybody either say yes or no...i know, as a first year students this thing happened ..as what i had experienced it during my early years in education..
BUT
that is about 17 years back in 1990..when the petronas twin tower was merely a mode of ideas..17 years and now the same problem occurs to my first year students*..
DEJA VU ?...
someone** up there should do something..as nothing seems to be done to "correct" the "syntax error"...

* terms and conditions applied
**eventhough i mostly aggreed that "you're the navigator of your own destiny"

articles to read...

i got to know dr. tajuddin rasdi only a few years back...somehow there is something about him that i wished would have known or met him or the kind of lecturers* back from my archi-education period...
well as "tak kenal maka tak cinta" ...so try and have a peek into what he got to say..
*i pay my tribute to my ex- lecturers:
  • en haidar
  • en mi
  • pak ku
  • en wan b

terima kasih..may allah bless you all..

is this architecture II



yesterday, 3rd of April...around 4:45pm...
the "hard rock" cafe of tago were blewn apart..
luckily the were no casualty...
imagine what if...
architecture is for all...there should be no discrimination to who..where or what you are...
ever heard architecture for the poor?
ever heard Hassan Fathy?
is our "hard rock cafe" a part of the "discrimination"
or is it just a part of the lack of "sense & sensibility"
or can it be because of we are being treat by those who suppose to be "human"
we're all human...(aren't we?)
only god's knows.....
* i once heard this..."sometime those individual in the human resource dept. must learn and act to be more human.."

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

dilbert the architect

so....do you want to be an architect?

crit any one?



Here are some of the best comments by lecturers and professors I’ve come accross, most of these quotes are from online blogs reading (archinet), some are from words of mouth while others are first hand experience.

Here goes:

“Why are you here? Don’t come back next semester.”
“Here’s a quarter. go call your mom and tell her you’re not going to be an architect.”
Your design is like masturbation, you want to know why? That is because only you yourself enjoyed and like it.
What is that boxy thing (model)? A coffin?
Your design sucks!
Your design is very tasteful… … for the tasteless.
“Is this a … structural… glob of glue?”
“When I went to school, at a different school than this one, there were students who would present projects like this one.And they would fail.”
“Your project looks like something that’s been through a trash compactor”
“This space that you’ve designed is the type place where beggars and dogs go to die”
“Are you in interior design?”
“Why are you studying architecture if you’re producing things like that?”
“Hey, everyone, gather round this project, come in close…because this is a great example for everyone of exactly what NOT to do..”
“This drawing isn’t worth the paper it is printed on.”
“This (model) is great…..just don’t let your dog play with it next time.”
“The program you invented was meant solely for your architectural masturbation……”
If you build this and after 10000 years the aliens see it, they would understand why humans extinguish
“Have you ever considered a career in accounting?”
“oh, so it’s like some kind of orgy pit!”
“So your parents are pay $20000 a year for this.”
“Your theory is bullshit. You don’t need that”
Prof pointing to part of a model, “Did you chew this?”

CAD


this image is a reminder
to those diparchian
whose design's depends on the AI..
"calling houston....we got problem!!-apollo13"

architorture any one?

Welcome to Architorture

It was probably an omen; the sign “Welcome to Architorture” was the only thing I noticed as I descended the stairs to the first-year studio spaces. Scrawled, graffiti-style, above the entrance, that sign, that slogan, imparted an intimidating atmosphere to the entryway; framing dark and heavy steel doors, the threshold had a slightly demonic character, as though these doors where the gates ushering us on an express train to some unknown hell. Some of my classmates laughed as they walked, and others remarked upon the refined composition of the lettering and painted character finishing his tag. Me? I just shuttered and let my eyes fall to the concrete floor as I stepped through those doors.
Architecture: the noble pursuit of shaping the physical space we occupy. It is a profession obsessed with individuality, creativity, innovation, of “breaking the box”. In school, we are taught that Architecture is the link between art and science, between sculpture and engineering, between the virtual and the real. The attraction is understandable – it is a profession focused on creation, on the physical realization of an idea, of solidifying the imaginary. Architects can make dreams become reality, can alter the way we live, work, sleep and eat. And, with a combination of timing, luck, and genius, an Architect can become an icon, a star – someone whose name becomes synonymous with a visual style, language, look; they are visionaries, challenging the status quo with images and ideas of what the world can become.
My attraction to Architecture was, in the beginning, less idealistic; when I was young, I liked building things. Wooden blocks, legos, sandcastles…it was a chance for me to make something out of nothing. I really enjoyed putting things together to see what odd concoction might evolve. No hopes of changing the world, no dreams of creating the highest stack ever recorded by man. Architecture was, in my mind, just a puzzle; except, with these puzzles, I got to decide what solution was right. If something I made seemingly resembled a building to the casual observer, well that was all the better.
So, to my surprise, there I was, trying to avoid the ominous “Architorture” sign, pondering what I was about to embark upon. Studying Architecture was never part of my plan. In fact, I had never even considered it a “real” option as I perused various college catalogues my junior and senior year of high school. It was hobby – one of those random interests you list when you fill out to make yourself seem more interesting, more educated, more intelligent. It wasn’t something I seriously considered as my profession, my future career. Yet, here I was, surrounded by seventy-five other fresh faces in various states of excitement and terror. Some already carried the air of arrogance I would come to associate with Architecture itself. Others seemed just as uncertain as I, which, while comforting, was also oddly disconcerting. After all, I assumed that everyone else had chosen to study Architecture, just like everyone assumed I had chosen to study Architecture. The reality, however, was that the opposite was true; I had not chosen Architecture. By circumstance (I refuse to say fate), Architecture had seemingly chosen me.
When I applied to college, I had focused on the various Ivy Leagues with their Liberal Arts mantras and their multitudes of possible majors. Since nothing had really inspired me in high school, I believed that college would be my haven, my place to find my true calling. When those options never materialized, I was left with my safety school and a department I had placed a distant third in my personal preferences. The idea of omens had come up then. My father stated that, apparently, I was meant for Architecture; given the circumstances surrounding my acceptance, my father called it a sign. My calling in life had fortuitously found me and eliminated me from the pesky and time-consuming trouble of attempting to choose it for myself. Lucky me. That’s what I continually told myself that summer before I entered college, what I repeated the first semester as I dedicated my life to my studio and its various projects, drawings, models and “conceptual explorations”.
The life of an Architecture student is, as I quickly found out, legendary. As freshman orientation commenced and I met fellow students from around the campus, I kept hearing the same thing over and over again. “You’re in architecture? Well…it was nice to meet, you, but I’ll probably never see you again.” The first time, I thought it was funny. The second time, I was slightly annoyed. But, as I continued to hear the same sentiments again and again, I began to seriously consider what was being said. I was completely clueless to the life I was about to lead; apparently everyone else in the world knew that an Architecture student had no life outside of their studio. That, whether we liked it or not, we would soon find ourselves, as architecture students, eating in studio, hanging out in studio, sleeping in studio…living in studio. The world that I was soon indoctrinated into revolved around all-nighters, loud music, off colored jokes and 2 am soda runs. It was a private world, a secluded world - an isolated world that, like a black hole, slowly, but steadily, sucked you in with little chance of escape.
I paint a bleak picture, but it is one that many architecture students will automatically recognize. So, given such an introduction, the question is likely “Why did you stay?” The answer is simpler that you might think, and simpler than I realized. I stayed because my five years in architecture were also captivating, exciting, and unlike anything else I had ever done.
As a result, after the projects, classes and late nights, I developed a love/hate relationship with the education that I came from and the profession I will eventually enter. That intense dichotomy made it possible for me to bitch with the best of them without ever dropping out of my program. And for many of my friends, this is also the case. While many of us bemoaned the heavy workload, can recount multiple horror stories of the sleep-deprived delirium experienced during our push towards final presentations, deep down, something about what we did, what we were doing, kept us plugging along. So much of what myself and my classmates learned through our experiences in Architecture studios, within the culture that has grown up around the specialized approach of an Architecture education, binds us together in ways that differentiate our college experience from others. It also allows us to meet other Architecture students and immediately relate to one another through a set of very, very familiar experiences.

this article is taken from "archi-hell blog"

have a nice day :)

mask

the mask of new "dparchian"
jan 2007